03-04-2023, 11:45 PM
(03-04-2023, 08:00 PM)Bengalholic Wrote: Some questions required the players give a ranking of 1-5, while other questions asked what they would change, improve, etc.
They state that it's 'not a scientific survey', that's it's a 'summary of players opinions' and that it's 'inherently subjective'.
I think the issue is that they there's no way of knowing who responded or what they said. For example, what were the opinions of the free agents who have signed over the last couple of years compared to guys on the practice squad? How many total players replied? We have no way of knowing. Just a lot of unknowns, so it's hard to know how seriously to take this survey.
The issue is The PLAYER'S ASSOCIATION graded how the owners treated the PLAYERS based on the PLAYER'S replies. Did anyone think they were going to grade them highly?
It's in their interest to assign low grades