03-14-2023, 12:56 PM
(03-14-2023, 11:05 AM)TecmoBengals Wrote: I think the idea is that he'll be over 30 when the deal ends. The Bengals didn't want to invest in an aging player/defender.
30 isnt old, even for football. This reminds me alot of the Andrew Whitworth stuff that happened. "He is too old" we dont want to sign him to a multiyear contract lets just keep signing him to 1 year contracts. When that happens eventually someone else is going to come in and take your players away from you. The idea that we need a bunch of 25-28 year old players to win the Super Bowl is absolutely ridiculous. There is no reason Bell shouldnt have been signed to that contract.
