Legal tampering period

[SunsetBengal]

(03-14-2023, 12:56 PM)007BengalsFan Wrote: 30 isnt old, even for football.  This reminds me alot of the Andrew Whitworth stuff that happened.  "He is too old" we dont want to sign him to a multiyear contract lets just keep signing him to 1 year contracts.  When that happens eventually someone else is going to come in and take your players away from you.   The idea that we need a bunch of 25-28 year old players to win the Super Bowl is absolutely ridiculous.   There is no reason Bell shouldnt have been signed to that contract.

I don't see how age could have been much of a factor, the guy is tough as nails, rarely gets dinged up.  It couldn't have been about the money, as he is very affordable for a player with his resume and experience.

I'm just thinking that the front office has a very specific plan that they are following.  It would just be nice if they would share some details of this plan with the rest of us.