03-14-2023, 02:37 PM
(03-14-2023, 06:22 AM)NUGDUKWE Wrote: I don't think it does. Football is a tough sport with injury potential but saying that your not walking away from a guy because of injury unless they are constant for at least 2 years. I understand not giving a fully guaranteed contract. But giving a player some security isn't a bad thing. Letting both safeties walk is a bad football/business decision.
(03-14-2023, 01:20 PM)3wt Wrote: Agreed. This was a mistake. He was the continuity we needed in the secondary, a baller and a locker room gem. Should have paid him.
Seriously? People were whining over us letting CJ walk and some complained about losing Lawson, Hurst and Trey were better.
I don't understand this immediate negative reaction until we see what might transpire? It's not like you guys haven't been through multiple off-seasons...