03-15-2023, 11:38 AM
(03-15-2023, 11:06 AM)RunKijanaRun Wrote: He was not "mid." He was pretty freaking good last year. You can make the argument that a 3 year commitment would be too much, but let's not revise history and act like he didn't have a great season. If not for the injury he was having a pro bowl caliber campaign.
I don't think he was needed all that much. I made this point in another thread and I will make it again. Hurst was injured late in the season and missed several games. We won every game Hurst missed. He wasn't needed and his loss had very little impact. We can easily find someone to replace him and at a cheaper cost.