03-18-2023, 02:50 PM
(03-17-2023, 03:49 PM)George Cantstandya Wrote: Yes, I brought this up earlier and the name of the program, perfomance-based, is a bit confusing as often performance is thought of as quality of performance. In this case it simply means they performed as in carried out an action and for the purpose of the bonus that means playing time. If it was based on quality of performance that would be a hard one to figure out especially for the positions where stats are not as clear as others and would place the bonuses to more subjectivity. So if quality of play were a factor it would be more like a pro-bowl selection with a cash bonus for low paid players. As I understand it the formula removes subjectivity from the equation.
On the other hand more playing time in the NFL is often, but not always, based on quality of performance. :)
Well said. Good move in the CBA I never really noticed until now, thanks George.
(03-18-2023, 07:13 AM)Mike M (the other one) Wrote: Understood, but then that would make it too subjective as to what is quality.
We already have enough of that problem with the refs.
*edit, N/M i see George explained it. :)
Yeah, don't need to get pissed off by more stuff LMAO!!!
