Will We Start Seeing More Two-TE Sets?

[3wt]

(12-21-2015, 10:16 AM)SHRacerX Wrote: If you look at most scenarios for the playoffs, the vast majority have that team from the east coming to Cincy.

I think two TE sets make a lot of sense against them.  One would stay in for an additional blocker, leaving you with two WRs, and a single back.  I think that the frequency of blitzes they are likely to see make it seem logical to have more maximum protection packages.  Have the RB stay in on passing downs, let him chip an end, and slide out as an outlet.

The best three targets the Bengals have are AJ Green, Eifert, and Marvin Jones.  Having those three in a pattern the majority of the time would create the best matchups, while you still have maximum protection and an outlet receiver.

I simply don't see Sanu getting any separation.  I would rather have Rex Burkhead in as the single back in rotation with Gio and Hill to chip and be an outlet.  

I don't think it will be that way every snap, but if it ends up being Mccarron, it does make sense.

Agreed.   I am less and less a fan.  And I was furious that he gave up the on side kickoff.  It was right in his hands!
I'm fine with him leaving next year if we have to lose a guy in that room.