05-22-2023, 02:00 PM
(05-22-2023, 01:44 PM)007BengalsFan Wrote: 22%-23% would be an absolute horrible deal for the Bengals and football in general. It would be as bad as the Cleveland Watson deal. The reason these big QB contracts work for teams is because they start out high and gradually take up less space as the contract moves further out and the cap goes up. 22%-23% would be starting out high at 51 -52 million per year then staying high and going higher. You wouldnt ever get relief and more cap room from the QB contract as years went on. The Bengals would be in much better shape making Burrow the highest paid QB in the NFL at 53 million a year on a regular contract. Its like front loading a contract knowing in the coming years you would have a larger percentage of the cap for other players. Sticking the contract at a 22% - 23% is just a horrible idea. You are guaranteeing the QB will take up a huge percentage on the salary cap every single year instead of getting relief in later years.
That's not necessarily (or even generally) true.
For instance, Hurts just signed a 5-year extension. The first year of the extension costs $13.5 Mil against the Cap, the last year of the contract costs $54.1 Mil against it.