05-23-2023, 09:49 PM
(05-23-2023, 11:24 AM)WeezyBengal Wrote: It'd be a mistake to value Higgins over Chase.
If they sign Higgins, then they absolutely need to sign Chase as well. If you are picking one, it should be Chase. Really hope they don't dig themselves into a hole by signing Higgins while letting Chase get away.
(05-23-2023, 03:48 PM)dxdtdemon Wrote: Why wouldn't you value Higgins over Chase? Chase is an injury liability who some sucker is still going to pay as if he can put up that level of production for a full season. Getting his level of production for 13 games is fine when he's still on his rookie contract, but giving Chase any kind of an extension will pan out as well as the Ken Griffey, Jr. contract did for the Reds. On the other hand, yes, Higgins missed time this past season, too, but at least he has played a full season in the past, and with his height and size, he is less of an injury liability than the tiny Chase. Also, his height and size is the only reason this offense can work despite not having a good TE, because Higgins can run down the middle of the field and get hit and not get seriously hurt like Chase would.
These comments cannot be serious. Weezy your comment is nonsensical, I have no idea how the thought even entered your brain? There have been zero signals that the org values Higgins over Chase....?
As to Mr. Demon, I congratulate you. That might be the dumbest comment we have had this off season. I am also on the fence thinking that this might be some kind of a troll post playing with all of us. If so you got me, and Im ok with that. Better to trick me than to actually have such a low knolwedge of ball.
