06-29-2023, 06:30 PM
(05-10-2023, 03:41 PM)ochocincos Wrote: Yes but the Bengals need some receivers who can do something in an offense if one of their starters goes down.
Trenton Irwin was ok, but the offense definitely lacked juice when Boyd went down.
Charlie Jones probably isn't going to see much time outside, so they need a guy with potential to groom behind Chase and Higgins.
Morgan is a ST-only guy. Basically a non-factor on offense.
If Iosivas can play ST about as well or better than Morgan, he'll make it over him. I thought I read/heard he could play ST decently well, so I'm optimistic on that front.
Both could make it though if they want to keep 7 WRs.
Ive shown stats before.. 5/6 WR do very little on teams on offense, the top priority for most teams when you are a 5/6 Wr is normally specials. Rarely do teams have a step and produce 5/6 WR, we are not unlike other teams. Look at our conference last year these are the backups in the 5/6 range, nobodys
Browns: Schwartz and Woods
Ravens: Proche and Wallace
Steelers: Sims and Olszewski...
Now lets look at KC Buffalo and Jacksonville division winners
KC: Moore and Toney: probably the best depth,, but they still only average just over 1 catch a game, but i say they have the most talent of any WR group
Bills: Kumerow and Crowder: these two had combined 10 catches, they pretty much went with 4 WRs with heavy TE
Jacksonville: Tim Jones; they only carried 5 Wrs, he had three receptions.