Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Taylor Swift=Bengals revenue
#80
(07-05-2023, 02:59 PM)Nate (formerly eliminate08) Wrote: Eh, have to disagree with some of what you say here Whatever. Gilmour is so clean and that is what makes his playing so special.

I understand he isn't a speedy guitarist and the slow walk up of a major scale reference, but that is just his style. Nothing wrong with it.

I still think he is the best at what he does and makes me close my eyes and just listen unlike any other guitarist.


David can make a guitar speak without the tube like Frampton and others use. Dude is special at what he does IMO. Rock On

I expect him to play really clean when most of his parts are relatively simple and when you look into his rig, he has noise suppression in almost every link of his signal chain.  

His parts fit well in in Pink Floyd 's songs and style, but so did Johnny Ramone's in The Ramones and I wouldn't hold him way up there, either(and I like a lot of The Ramones stuff).  

A guy doesn't necessarily have to be ultra fast to be great, IMO.  I can appreciate a lot of different attributes, from Bob Weir's insane knowledge of chord inversions, to the crazy stretches Andy Summers pulls off, to the bends Stevie Ray Vaughan could do while using very heavy gauge strings.  But playing routine parts cleanly with virtually every noise cancelling trick in the book isn't one of them.  
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
Taylor Swift=Bengals revenue - pally - 06-29-2023, 03:53 PM
RE: Taylor Swift=Bengals revenue - Sled21 - 06-30-2023, 08:23 AM
RE: Taylor Swift=Bengals revenue - Sled21 - 06-30-2023, 02:21 PM
RE: Taylor Swift=Bengals revenue - Garrus - 06-30-2023, 02:37 PM
RE: Taylor Swift=Bengals revenue - Sled21 - 07-01-2023, 05:13 PM
RE: Taylor Swift=Bengals revenue - IcoHolic - 06-30-2023, 09:56 AM
RE: Taylor Swift=Bengals revenue - Stewy - 06-30-2023, 01:43 PM
RE: Taylor Swift=Bengals revenue - IcoHolic - 06-30-2023, 09:54 AM
RE: Taylor Swift=Bengals revenue - Sled21 - 06-30-2023, 02:24 PM
RE: Taylor Swift=Bengals revenue - pally - 06-30-2023, 12:03 PM
RE: Taylor Swift=Bengals revenue - bfine32 - 06-30-2023, 12:57 PM
RE: Taylor Swift=Bengals revenue - bfine32 - 07-03-2023, 11:22 PM
RE: Taylor Swift=Bengals revenue - Housh - 06-30-2023, 05:27 PM
RE: Taylor Swift=Bengals revenue - Housh - 07-01-2023, 11:24 AM
RE: Taylor Swift=Bengals revenue - Sled21 - 07-02-2023, 11:17 AM
RE: Taylor Swift=Bengals revenue - Garrus - 07-05-2023, 09:40 AM
RE: Taylor Swift=Bengals revenue - Sled21 - 07-04-2023, 11:24 AM
RE: Taylor Swift=Bengals revenue - t3r3e3 - 07-05-2023, 11:07 AM
RE: Taylor Swift=Bengals revenue - Sled21 - 07-05-2023, 08:31 AM
RE: Taylor Swift=Bengals revenue - Whatever - 07-06-2023, 10:21 AM
RE: Taylor Swift=Bengals revenue - jason - 07-07-2023, 08:30 PM
RE: Taylor Swift=Bengals revenue - t3r3e3 - 07-05-2023, 03:21 AM
RE: Taylor Swift=Bengals revenue - Sled21 - 07-05-2023, 11:06 AM
RE: Taylor Swift=Bengals revenue - t3r3e3 - 07-05-2023, 11:08 AM
RE: Taylor Swift=Bengals revenue - Sled21 - 07-05-2023, 03:00 PM
RE: Taylor Swift=Bengals revenue - bfine32 - 07-05-2023, 09:56 PM
RE: Taylor Swift=Bengals revenue - Sled21 - 07-07-2023, 09:05 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)