08-14-2023, 06:11 AM
(08-13-2023, 10:50 PM)sandwedge Wrote: This is a pretty dumb take. How do you know if we didn't have Burrow we wouldn't win? You have anything to back that up? We had a pretty crappy roster Zac's first year. Burrow is a big part of the team, but if he is all we need then why are we going to spend a lot of money on 2 WRs? Zac had a plan for this team and he got to build this team to that plan. I think the results speak for themselves.
That is an ugly stupid take. We didn't win prior to Burrow, more importantly, we were winning games during his rookie year BEFORE he was injured.
The other ugly stupid take is that using your logic the Bengals are going to spend a lot of money on Burrow than possibly two WRs.
Just admit it you are a Zac fanboy.
![[Image: 4540978331_3e8fe35323.jpg]](http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2781/4540978331_3e8fe35323.jpg)