Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Should the Bengals be shopping for backup QB?
#36
(08-14-2023, 02:31 PM)Nately120 Wrote: I hear ya, part of talking NFL is admitting that the 2008 Lions have made it as hard to be critical of the preason as Brady being drafted at 199 has made it hard to discount a QB taken...anywhere in the draft.  Kurt Warner helps dispel the myth that a QB even needs to be drafted. 

What do all of those things have in common, though? They were all very fluky occurrences. Hence why we remember them.

2 QB's (3 if you want to count Romo) being taken late (or not being drafted at all) doesn't throw a wrench into the notion that you should draft a QB in the first round.

Just as the 2007 Patriots or 2008 Lions don't prove that preseason doesn't matter. Particularly when it comes to evaluating individual players.

Edit: I just noticed that you said essentially the same thing to bfine. ThumbsUp
The training, nutrition, medicine, fitness, playbooks and rules evolve. The athlete does not.
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: Should the Bengals be shopping for backup QB? - Shake n Blake - 08-14-2023, 02:37 PM
Cut Siemian - Rotobeast - 08-23-2023, 12:15 AM
RE: Cut Siemian - bfine32 - 08-23-2023, 12:37 AM
RE: Cut Siemian - Rotobeast - 08-23-2023, 12:46 AM
RE: Cut Siemian - coachmcneil71 - 08-23-2023, 01:34 AM
RE: Cut Siemian - pally - 08-23-2023, 01:53 AM
RE: Cut Siemian - Go Cards - 08-23-2023, 07:24 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 33 Guest(s)