Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Goodberry did analysis of the defense - not pretty
#36
We knew there would be risk with those coming in to replace departing guys and if/when injuries occur.

Murphy isn't an adequate replacement for Hubbard (yet) when out.
Scott is well below what we're used to from Bell/Bates.
Irv Smith is well below what we're used to from the TE spot.

Hill, CTB, and Turner have played well though, so they seem like good picks so far.

Let's be honest though...is this team worse than it was the past two years due to departures?
Defense is definitely worse compared to previous two seasons.
Offensive line does seem to be somewhat better, at least in terms of sacks allowed. They're still seemingly allowing a lot of pressures though, and the run game is not any better than previous years.
Pass catchers not as good this year compared to previous two years, mainly due to TE room.
Zac Taylor 2019-2020: 6 total wins
Zac Taylor 2021-2022: Double-digit wins each season, plus 5 postseason wins
Zac Taylor 2023: 9 wins despite losing Burrow half the season
Zac Taylor 2024: Started 1-4. If he can turn this into a playoff appearance, it will be impressive.

Sorry for Party Rocking!

[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: Goodberry did analysis of the defense - not pretty - ochocincos - 11-15-2023, 01:11 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)