Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Jake Fisher changes number and position
#37
(12-31-2015, 05:45 PM)StLucieBengal Wrote: I think the lack of a FB on the roster is a just a numbers thing.   Plus we carry a lot of DL.    Plus Hewitt surprised them and can play a bit of it all.  

I remember on hard knocks Jay wanted to keep John Conner and Hue lobbied hard for Orson Charles and the HB position.     Which is consistent to how he did in Oakland with Marcell Reece.

I know it's a numbers thing, but I think it's finally time to admit mistake with some of these DL they have flooding their roster. They have five who are struggling to even be active.

Will Clarke: 12 games, 0 starts, 3 solo tackles, 1 ast tackle, 0.5 sacks, 1 Pdef
Brandon Thompson: 8 games, 0 starts, 3 solo tackles, 4 ast tackls, 0.5 sacks
Pat Sims: 8 games, 0 starts, 4 solo tackles, 12 ast tackles
Margus Hunt: 6 games, 0 starts, 1 solo tackle, 1 ast tackle
Marcus Hardison: 0 games

That's the sadest group of statlines for a position I have ever seen. I saw a drive where the Broncos did a hurry up offense while the Bengals had Hunt, Thompson, Sims, and Johnson out there for the DL. Guess what? They had all day to throw. The "rotation" only works if over half of it doesn't suck. Lol

Swap one of those guys out for a true FB. You really won't be missing much. (EDIT: A good slot WR wouldn't hurt either. Need a chain mover other than Bernard.)
____________________________________________________________

[Image: pablo-narcos.gif]
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: Jake Fisher changes number and position - TheLeonardLeap - 12-31-2015, 06:02 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 42 Guest(s)