Should Wilkins be #1 FA target if not tagged?

[SunsetBengal]

(01-17-2024, 08:27 PM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: I can't tell if you're trying to being serious and just misread my post wrong or if you're intentionally misreading my post and just trying to troll. 

Literally the standard, as in every single player has the exact same standard applied to them on what age season they are. So you don't have to deal with "basically xx age seasons". One standard for all >2000 players on what age season it is for them with no bias involved. So it's not using "age 29 season" as a way to make someone seem like they have more wear and tear, as you alleged. It's just using the exact same standard that has been placed on all players to report the number.

And this is important because it makes all duration evaluations equal.  Some look at a player who turned pro at age 23 and and another who turned pro at 21 and think that one has "more tread" left on his tires because he's played two fewer years.  However, college play is just as accumulative on the body as pro seasons.