If Tyler Boyd was used as the #2 WR in 2024 – How well would he do ? – POLL

[*TheLeonardLeap*]

(01-23-2024, 02:48 PM)SunsetBengal Wrote: But I wasn't trying to boost his viability as a starter, I said that I felt that he'd earned a shot to compete.  I want a better TE1, weather it be a signed FA or a drafted rookie.  I just also see the value of having Drew Sample and Tanner Hudson on the roster as well.

Then why disagree with me when I was disagreeing with Essex who considers himself a believer that Hudson is our answer at TE? If Hudson could compete against a signed veteran for TE1, then we're admitting we signed a terrible veteran and just wasted money. No Irv Smith Jr part 2s, please. I don't want our starting TE to be the 5th best TE in the division with a healthy gap between them and 4th.

I don't hate Hudson or Sample on the roster for depth. Key word being or. I don't like having both because then you've just nearly recreated the 2023 TE room as you're only likely going to have 3 guys active on gameday and you're likely not going to have a guy you paid in FA (both of them are FAs) a healthy scratch. I want some roster churn at the position to make it actually look different. Give me a veteran with proven production and a rookie with potential both along with one of those two guys.