02-11-2024, 08:18 PM
(02-11-2024, 06:22 PM)Housh Wrote: You are NEVER gonna pay Tee 25M per and be mad that you did it, outside of him being injured.
Think about it.
If we have Tee the next 3-7 years and he never got injured you would probably view 25M per as a DISCOUNT.
The ONLY reason you'd be against paying Tee is his availability.
When he plays hes a #1. Every game Jamarr Chase is injured, Tee turns into a MONSTER.
Im sorry but I want that monster on the team. If its a bad deal in 3 years so be it. Itll look like a great deal when its 17-24 the bad guys, and Tee catches a jumpball over 2 people and ties it up.
It's only a good take if he's never injured and IS available, which his history says he won't be.
This is a "In perfect world" take, which is nothing more than fan wishing.