02-13-2024, 06:55 PM
(02-11-2024, 06:22 PM)Housh Wrote: You are NEVER gonna pay Tee 25M per and be mad that you did it, outside of him being injured.
Think about it.
If we have Tee the next 3-7 years and he never got injured you would probably view 25M per as a DISCOUNT.
The ONLY reason you'd be against paying Tee is his availability.
When he plays hes a #1. Every game Jamarr Chase is injured, Tee turns into a MONSTER.
Im sorry but I want that monster on the team. If its a bad deal in 3 years so be it. Itll look like a great deal when its 17-24 the bad guys, and Tee catches a jumpball over 2 people and ties it up.
The question is how can you not take his huge injury history into consideration? It's not like all of a sudden he will be healthy from here on out. He has a long injury history particularly with his hamstring.
I personally think we should tag and trade him and build this team up. There are alot of holes that need to be filled.
I love Tee but I wouldnt bank on his health for the money he wants and his agent is a real pain in the ss and is going to go for the gusto. Lets not pull a Bastes and keep him for a year and then have nothing to show afterwards for it.
"If the most important thing is the financials' and the second most important thing is winning, then you don't have a chance. It's so important for ownership to do what it takes to win"
