Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Name a movie that should not have had a sequel
#47
(06-10-2015, 12:35 PM)WhoDeyWho Wrote: I disagree. Silly movies like "Sharknado" are tailor-made for sequels:  add better b-list cameos and more ridiculously absurd situations and you have a franchise.  Expectations are low from the start so it isn't like you can really disappoint.

On the contrary, I hate when they take a perfectly good movie and ruin it by introducing a lame sequel.  Jaws 2 and The Godfather part 3 come to mind.    

The problem was it was trying too hard to be funny. The movie is ridiculous on its own, but when you add your own part of comedy to make it too ridiculous on top of the ridiculousness, it isn't funny. Batting a shark into a scoreboard? Nah. It had a feel of a comedy, not a b movie. That's the problem
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: Name a movie that should not have had a sequel - eoxyod - 06-11-2015, 03:03 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)