03-01-2024, 07:08 PM
Thanks for this thread.
The more I think about it, with Tee already tagged, outside of the trenches (DT/NT, OT), I think a vet S makes the next most sense for a significant FA signing.
The FA classes for TE & IOL are thin. Given what we are paying Higgins (and soon Chase), even a medium priced WR does not seem wise, given the deep draft class and with Jones and Yoshi already here. The CB class us pretty deep and we (probably) are only looking at depth. Unless we strike it rich at DT/OT in FA, but then we are talking #18, not a FA. LB is depth only. And the only way we spend big at RB is if we cut Mixon..and that seems unlikely to me.
With a lot og quality S's on the market, and a lot of teams averse to spending at that position, we could get a very good bargain. A solid vet to pair with Battle deep would let Dax be closer to the LOS, he could mentor both. And I bet we'd play a lot of "big dime" with 3 S's.
And we could cut Scott loose.
The more I think about it, with Tee already tagged, outside of the trenches (DT/NT, OT), I think a vet S makes the next most sense for a significant FA signing.
The FA classes for TE & IOL are thin. Given what we are paying Higgins (and soon Chase), even a medium priced WR does not seem wise, given the deep draft class and with Jones and Yoshi already here. The CB class us pretty deep and we (probably) are only looking at depth. Unless we strike it rich at DT/OT in FA, but then we are talking #18, not a FA. LB is depth only. And the only way we spend big at RB is if we cut Mixon..and that seems unlikely to me.
With a lot og quality S's on the market, and a lot of teams averse to spending at that position, we could get a very good bargain. A solid vet to pair with Battle deep would let Dax be closer to the LOS, he could mentor both. And I bet we'd play a lot of "big dime" with 3 S's.
And we could cut Scott loose.
