Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Veteran Safety being considered
#18
(03-01-2024, 10:52 PM)bfine32 Wrote: We save $6.4 Mil in cutting Hilton, we do that and CTB w/ his 21 NFL starts is our "vet" in the backfield. I think we can sign a vet SS/FS  and Lou still has plenty young guys to develop 

Don't love that. Feels like that would lead to a net loss in experience in an already inexperienced group. I also wonder if it would really make us better if we're trading out Hilton for a vet safety signing, which then means you're going to have 2 new guys with no experience playing their position in the system rather than 0. I say that assuming that vet SS/FS isn't going to be Antoine Winfield because of both money and he's expected to be tagged.
____________________________________________________________

[Image: atkins2.0.gif]

[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
Veteran Safety being considered - J24 - 03-01-2024, 06:26 PM
RE: Veteran Safety being considered - J24 - 03-01-2024, 09:46 PM
RE: Veteran Safety being considered - TheLeonardLeap - 03-02-2024, 02:26 AM
RE: Veteran Safety being considered - J24 - 03-02-2024, 12:54 AM
RE: Veteran Safety being considered - J24 - 03-06-2024, 07:12 PM
RE: Veteran Safety being considered - J24 - 03-06-2024, 07:28 PM
RE: Veteran Safety being considered - J24 - 03-07-2024, 07:30 PM
RE: Veteran Safety being considered - J24 - 03-06-2024, 04:00 PM
RE: Veteran Safety being considered - Nepa - 03-06-2024, 07:19 PM
RE: Veteran Safety being considered - Nepa - 03-07-2024, 12:33 PM
RE: Veteran Safety being considered - tms - 03-07-2024, 12:54 PM
RE: Veteran Safety being considered - J24 - 03-07-2024, 11:36 PM
RE: Veteran Safety being considered - Nepa - 03-07-2024, 03:55 PM
RE: Veteran Safety being considered - Nepa - 03-07-2024, 08:38 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)