Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Veteran Safety being considered
#21
(03-01-2024, 09:46 PM)J24 Wrote: We're a majority single High team; if we suck at that position it's going to really hurt our defense. So investing in that position shouldn't be frowned upon. 

Simply put and so true.  The staff has pointed out multiple times they have to communicate back there.  We can't confuse Hill's draft position with thinking it forces him to start at FS.  The quickest route towards "communication" is an experienced vet. That doesn't mean we have to cut Hilton and force Hill to replace another starter. Just because they want a vet safety doesn't mean they're spending big bucks to do so.
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
Veteran Safety being considered - J24 - 03-01-2024, 06:26 PM
RE: Veteran Safety being considered - J24 - 03-01-2024, 09:46 PM
RE: Veteran Safety being considered - phil413 - 03-02-2024, 02:17 PM
RE: Veteran Safety being considered - J24 - 03-02-2024, 12:54 AM
RE: Veteran Safety being considered - J24 - 03-06-2024, 07:12 PM
RE: Veteran Safety being considered - J24 - 03-06-2024, 07:28 PM
RE: Veteran Safety being considered - J24 - 03-07-2024, 07:30 PM
RE: Veteran Safety being considered - J24 - 03-06-2024, 04:00 PM
RE: Veteran Safety being considered - Nepa - 03-06-2024, 07:19 PM
RE: Veteran Safety being considered - Nepa - 03-07-2024, 12:33 PM
RE: Veteran Safety being considered - tms - 03-07-2024, 12:54 PM
RE: Veteran Safety being considered - J24 - 03-07-2024, 11:36 PM
RE: Veteran Safety being considered - Nepa - 03-07-2024, 03:55 PM
RE: Veteran Safety being considered - Nepa - 03-07-2024, 08:38 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)