Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Bengals sign Moss, Cut Mixon
#9
(03-11-2024, 11:12 PM)THE PISTONS Wrote: He's more a #2. Did good while Taylor held out.

He was basically a top 5 back over that span.

https://www.si.com/nfl/colts/news/why-colts-should-retain-zack-moss

Not only did he have good production but he blocked very well and even catches well enough though not a threat.  He's good value and hitting his prime, what's not to like.  He's their starter and they may even ger a solid value signing on the next wave even.  Draft class isn't ideal so having RB out of the way would be nice.  Love then money saved from Mixon. 
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: Bengals sign Moss - phil413 - 03-11-2024, 11:09 PM
RE: Bengals sign Moss - THE PISTONS - 03-11-2024, 11:12 PM
RE: Bengals sign Moss - phil413 - 03-11-2024, 11:21 PM
RE: Bengals sign Moss - SouthernStripes - 03-11-2024, 11:14 PM
RE: Bengals sign Moss - Joelist - 03-11-2024, 11:16 PM
RE: Bengals sign Moss - SouthernStripes - 03-11-2024, 11:17 PM
RE: Bengals sign Moss - Essex Johnson - 03-11-2024, 11:17 PM
RE: Bengals sign Moss, Cut Mixon - pulses - 03-12-2024, 01:16 AM
RE: Bengals sign Moss, Cut Mixon - pulses - 03-12-2024, 02:43 PM
RE: Bengals sign Moss, Cut Mixon - pulses - 03-12-2024, 08:31 PM
RE: Bengals sign Moss, Cut Mixon - pulses - 03-12-2024, 02:41 PM
RE: Bengals sign Moss, Cut Mixon - Whacked - 03-12-2024, 10:52 AM
RE: Bengals sign Moss, Cut Mixon - Joelist - 03-12-2024, 10:59 AM
RE: Bengals sign Moss, Cut Mixon - pally - 03-14-2024, 04:41 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)