Poll: Grade the Signing
This poll is closed.
A
24.69%
20 24.69%
B
53.09%
43 53.09%
C
20.99%
17 20.99%
D
1.23%
1 1.23%
F
0%
0 0%
Total 81 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Grade the Mike Gesicki Signing
#37
(03-13-2024, 12:48 AM)Nate (formerly eliminate08) Wrote: Noah Fant's numbers are not impressive. He has upside and that was why I wanted him. Gesicki is actually had the better career from
what I have seen and is a better pass catcher besides his last year with terrible QB play in NE. Gesicki looked good in Miami.

I would of never paid Fant what he was paid. I liked your come on guys gif BTW, made me laugh.

2 yrs 21M?  I would have paid Fant that number all day.  Stat chasing numbers such as yardage is not the optimal process in his case.  

Fant has not had good QBs and was in an offense with 3 very good WRs and another solid TE.

Tell me the last TE we had with catch and runs of 75 yards, 51 and 51?  I'll wait....
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
Grade the Mike Gesicki Signing - jj22 - 03-12-2024, 12:22 PM
RE: Grade the Mike Gesicki Signing - Nepa - 03-12-2024, 01:32 PM
RE: Grade the Mike Gesicki Signing - M.W. - 03-12-2024, 07:55 PM
RE: Grade the Mike Gesicki Signing - J24 - 03-12-2024, 08:16 PM
RE: Grade the Mike Gesicki Signing - casear2727 - 03-13-2024, 02:00 AM
RE: Grade the Mike Gesicki Signing - wanga - 03-13-2024, 03:15 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)