Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Nearly $70 million under the Cap has produced this underwhelming free agency period?
#65
(03-13-2024, 06:10 PM)Luvnit2 Wrote: We signed Higgins, that ate up almost 22 million in 2024. 

 Mixon cut and Moss addition netted us additional cap money.

We had no TE on the roster, we signed Sample and Gesicki for team friendly deals. 

We signed back our back up RB Williams and ST star Davis - Gaither

We upgraded Geno Stone from Scott

What would you have done differently on day 1 of FA?

I would have signed Ridley for the $18 million a year with the exact same production as Higgins and traded Higgins. 

If I told you we signed Higgins for 4 years 72 million,  would you have been excited?  That's rhetorical.

Huge opportunity missed. 

You can't sign Higgins to $24-27 million,  he's not that guy. Hell the $22 million this year isn't warranted but I understand you had to do it.

You certainly can't be convinced that Mixon for Moss and saving a few million in cap space is worth the risk of losing stability in the run game.

Where is the help on the O-line? I pray it's coming.
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: Nearly $70 million under the Cap has produced this underwhelming free agency period? - Jugular Joe - 03-13-2024, 08:59 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)