Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Nearly $70 million under the Cap has produced this underwhelming free agency period?
#78
(03-13-2024, 08:59 PM)Jugular Joe Wrote: I would have signed Ridley for the $18 million a year with the exact same production as Higgins and traded Higgins. 

If I told you we signed Higgins for 4 years 72 million,  would you have been excited?  That's rhetorical.

Huge opportunity missed. 

You can't sign Higgins to $24-27 million,  he's not that guy.  Hell the $22 million this year isn't warranted but I understand you had to do it.

You certainly can't be convinced that Mixon for Moss and saving a few million in cap space is worth the risk of losing stability in the run game.

Where is the help on the O-line? I pray it's coming.

Maybe admit you panicked and jumped the gun. Rankin and Bell just made our defense a lot better. And, we still have money to spend.

Let's revisit this thread after the draft. My hunch is it will not age well.
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
I am so ready for 2024 season. I love pro football and hoping for a great Bengals year. Regardless, always remember it is a game and entertainment. 
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: Nearly $70 million under the Cap has produced this underwhelming free agency period? - Luvnit2 - 03-13-2024, 11:52 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)