Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Time for the D
#7
(01-04-2016, 02:13 AM)GreenCornBengal Wrote: There is no reason that whomever we have in at QB should determine this game. Sure, we might play better with one QB or the other, but it shouldn't dictate the game. We have an amazing defense, and they need to prove it.

I'm talking about our dreadlock crew out there.

-Burfict
-Nelson
-Pacman
-Kirkpatrick

If these 4 plays lights out, there is no way that Pitt can win. Geno and Dunlap are just the cherry on top. Honestly, there is no reason that this defense shouldn't dominate this game and win for us.

We always want to talk about the QB and the offense, but its time for the defense to step up and carry this team.
I agree that the Defense has seemed to get a free pass but to think that the offense does not factor into the equation is wrong and to think not having Dalton does not factor into the equation is wrong also.  If our offense does not move the ball, then field position will dictate the game more than Defense..

I do give more weight to our Defense in this game but the Offense has to perform with our backup QB... 
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
Time for the D - GreenCornBengal - 01-04-2016, 02:13 AM
RE: Time for the D - thegimp - 01-04-2016, 07:56 AM
RE: Time for the D - GodFather - 01-04-2016, 03:45 PM
RE: Time for the D - djam - 01-04-2016, 08:08 AM
RE: Time for the D - jeremydc - 01-04-2016, 08:10 AM
RE: Time for the D - reuben.ahmed - 01-04-2016, 08:45 AM
RE: Time for the D - The Real Deal - 01-04-2016, 11:05 AM
RE: Time for the D - OrlandoBengal - 01-04-2016, 03:31 PM
RE: Time for the D - GreenCornBengal - 01-04-2016, 03:59 PM
RE: Time for the D - Essex Johnson - 01-04-2016, 11:26 AM
RE: Time for the D - lone bengal - 01-04-2016, 03:18 PM
RE: Time for the D - CJD - 01-04-2016, 03:21 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 6 Guest(s)