01-06-2016, 10:59 AM
If we beat the Steelers (I'm not seeing it personally, but statistically, it is possible) with McCarron as the starter and Andy Dalton is good to go for New England, you play Dalton.
This is an imaginary discussion among the fans that is not occurring between the coaches of this team.
If Dalton plays against New England and it is obvious his thumb/grip/throwing motion/rust is a detriment to the team, you put McCarron back in.
Starters are not required by rule to play the entire game unless injured. If Dalton shows that he came back too quickly, you simply sit him down and play McCarron.
But if he's healthy and effective, you play him.
I don't understand the argument of people who would play McCarron without giving Dalton even a chance in the next game.
Dalton was the MVP candidate, not McCarron.
This is an imaginary discussion among the fans that is not occurring between the coaches of this team.
If Dalton plays against New England and it is obvious his thumb/grip/throwing motion/rust is a detriment to the team, you put McCarron back in.
Starters are not required by rule to play the entire game unless injured. If Dalton shows that he came back too quickly, you simply sit him down and play McCarron.
But if he's healthy and effective, you play him.
I don't understand the argument of people who would play McCarron without giving Dalton even a chance in the next game.
Dalton was the MVP candidate, not McCarron.