Kicker market

[*Go Cards*]

(08-07-2024, 03:15 PM)Essex Johnson Wrote: But the point made was if you were not impressed those 2 years stated , then you would have been less impressed with Elliott,  correct?

 It was obvious that Elliot had a much higher ceiling by kicking FG's from spots the Bengals were missing or punting from beforehand. Wouldn't you agree ? I mean it was clear he had a much stronger leg and just needed to become more accurate on the mid range FG's. 

Many on here thought he had more potential than Randy, and many walked the stat line without having any vision and just proclaimed to be right per the #'s. Hard to argue against at the moment although many did, but now that it clearly went one direction they still want to defend those ancient #'s.  

it's plain and simple Elliott > Fat Randy 

#'s are a good baseline but do not tell the whole story and why they actually play the games in lieu of letting the math decide. I mean why have the Olympics, we know who runs the fastest times already.