Why Still Mike Brown ?

[kevin]

(08-16-2024, 04:18 PM)ochocincos Wrote: Remember, they are also trying to figure things out with Higgins as well.
If you give Chase a big extension while Higgins is still a Bengal, it could cause drama.

Higgins would/could feel extremely unappreciated by the Bengals and his performance could suffer from it.

Or maybe they are still trying to figure out a Higgins extension and want to prioritize that since Higgins is in a contract year whereas Chase still has 2 more years.
I know that the deadline to get a long-term deal for this year for Higgins has passed (mid-July) since he's on the tag, but they can still revisit the topic after the season is done before FA opens.

If this is all true, then Mike Brown makes it too complicated.  Just keep Burrow to Chase, it's not rocket science.   I say Mike Brown, not the others, because Mike Brown told New York Times that this might not be the time to do Chase contract.  Which brings me back to Why Mike Brown ?  Why are we the team stuck with this guy over the decades ?  Yes to the guy who said grandchildren should get lawyers and force Pops into retirement.