Poll: Should Bengals let Chase Walk after Rookie Contract?
This poll is closed.
YES
13.43%
9 13.43%
NO
86.57%
58 86.57%
Total 67 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Rating:
  • 2 Vote(s) - 1.5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Ja' Marr Chase's Contract: Should Bengals let him walk?
#50
(09-25-2024, 03:55 PM)J24 Wrote: Yes; we should trade him. No, we should not just let him walk in free agency.

Chase is about to get a 4 year, 160 million dollar deal, and with 120 Million in guaranteed money. If you sign him to that deal; then we can kiss signing any other legit players to long term deals in free agency.

On the other hand if you sign Tee to a 3 year, 90 Million dollar deal, and 60 million guaranteed money. You probably could fit 1 or 2  more players who have decent contracts onto the team.

So in essence do you want Chase at 160 or Tee at 90 + a new 3T, + a new NT, + a 1st rd pick , and a 2nd Rd pick.

I would rather pay Chase 35 million per year vs giving Tee 30 million per year.  I dont think Chase is worth 35 million per year but Tee is certainly not worth 30 million.
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: Ja' Marr Chase's Contract: Should Bengals let him walk? - 007BengalsFan - 09-26-2024, 06:44 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)