Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 1 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Letting Tee walk would essentially be doing the same thing you did to the D, to the O
#24
(10-06-2024, 06:45 PM)Housh Wrote: Letting Bates and Reader walk basically turned us into bums



I think atp with how trash our coaching is, if you don’t keep Tee you are basically doing the same thing to the offense. The reason Burrow is so good is cause he finally has a run game AND his WRs are going insane. Why in the entire heck would you let a main cog in your offense walk?

But we’re gonna do it…

And when the offense inevitably goes down hill next year it’ll be because we were once again cheap as hell

This is inevitable though at some point.
Good teams cannot keep all their good talent with the salary cap.
They would have had to let at least one of Burrow, Chase, Higgins, Bates, Reader, Wilson, and/or Pratt walk.
This is the entire purpose of drafting and developing well.
You need to be able to have replacements if and when your proven guys leave here and there.
Zac Taylor 2019-2020: 6 total wins
Zac Taylor 2021-2022: Double-digit wins each season, plus 5 postseason wins
Zac Taylor 2023: 9 wins despite losing Burrow half the season
Zac Taylor 2024: Started 1-4. If he can turn this into a playoff appearance, it will be impressive.

Sorry for Party Rocking!

[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: Letting Tee walk would essentially be doing the same thing you did to the D, to the O - ochocincos - 10-07-2024, 09:09 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 13 Guest(s)