Can anybody tell me why?

[Brownshoe]

(10-07-2024, 10:20 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Of course, that's not what I said.

How is trying a game-winning FG playing "not to lose"? You know if you miss the other team is basically already in FG range. Wouldn't playing not to lose have us punting and trying to pin them deep?

I'm sure you and many others who are mad think he deserves all the criticism he's getting. There is no problem with our offense or our playcalling. 

Rofl, no. Playing not to lose is not trying to go for a first down. Meaning, trying to avoid a sack or INT. Playing to win would be going a bit more aggressive, just like Tee Higgins said we should have done (is Taylor losing the locker room?  ). Punting there would be playing to lose.