10-08-2024, 12:29 AM
(10-08-2024, 12:12 AM)bfine32 Wrote: Did you just talk about how trying a FG and missing meant we were obviously going to lose, then assert we tried said FG as part of "playing not to lose?"
And did you also add the FG Zac missed at that moment to make him 3 of 4 for the year? Why not say he was perfect at 50+ this year?
Well he is no longer perfect is he? You cant assume because he made his first 3 kicks at 50+ he is going to make the 4th and he didnt. Yes Zac was playing not to lose. It should have been obvious to everyone we lose the game if the kick isnt good but I dont think Zac realized that. Like a kid that gets scared and wont move when they know they should, Zac froze. He is not head coach material.