Dan orlovosky is right about zac!

[*TheLeonardLeap*]

(10-24-2024, 04:31 PM)Wyche Wrote: McDaniel ain't shit without Tua. 

Most coaches are worse when their good QB is out.

Zac is 8-22 without Burrow. 8-24 if you count the two games Burrow got season ending injuries during as being without Burrow.


- - - - - - -
I'm actually curious if Tua isn't as good as we think and McDaniel would be even better with a legitimately good (and healthier) QB. Sort of like a Jimmy G/Shanahan or A Smith/Reid situation. 

Remember Tua played for 2 year without McDaniel and was averaging per 17 games... 3,302 yards (194.2 ypg), 20 TD/11 INT, 6.6 YPA, 88.8 QB Rating. With McDaniel he's averaging per 17 games... 4,598 yards (270.5 ypg), 30 TD/13 INT, 8.5 YPA, 101.5 QB Rating.