10-25-2024, 05:14 PM
(10-24-2024, 02:24 PM)J24 Wrote: Agreed; Zac changed his offense to fit what Browning does best.
Zac is good at adapting to his players and is willing to change his playback to fit said players. If he was a bad coach he wouldn't do that.
True and that is why I still have hope with the guy, that he is young.
Before Burrow went down and Browning and the team played damn near good enough to make the Playoffs I thought Zac might of
been carried by the players, not after this.
(10-24-2024, 04:24 PM)Wyche Wrote: There's a lot of good points....pro and con....but are people REALLY saying they'd rather have Marvin? Talk about short memories/revisionist history!!!!
Anyone saying that is out of their Goard.
(10-24-2024, 05:08 PM)Wyche Wrote: ...... doesn't matter when you discuss 4-3 with Jake Browning around here, so I figured it had relevance.
Yes, all of a sudden it doesn't matter because Browning played well when Burrow went down, convenient I must say.
Tua goes down and the fins under McDaniel fall on their face.
(10-25-2024, 04:08 AM)Forever Spinning Vinyl Wrote: Totally agreed. I've said for years that's it's somewhat insulting that a 30 nothing year old thinks that he can run an NFL sideline and call a game at the same time, something is going to suffer.
The last few sentences at the end of this video has a somewhat disturbing stat mentioned.
"I know that you were baffled by that stat that Stephen A shared with us, Kyle Shanahan's San Francisco 49ers 0-40 when trailing by at least 8 . . . The Bengals? 0-48 in that situation" . . . I'm guessing she forgot to add "under Zac Taylor".
