Higgins Liste Questionable.... AGAIN

[*jason*]

(10-27-2024, 11:45 AM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: You're mixing up two things there. They suck to start the season with or without him. That's just Zac football. In Week 1&2 games where Higgins plays 50%+ of the snaps, the Bengals are 1-5.

I normally point out when people get too fiddily with stat criteria, but for the sake of this very specific point, if you look at non-Week 1&2 games where Joe Burrow plays 50%+ but Tee Higgins plays <50% they are 4-1. 

Yes. That's probably a more accurate representation. I still stand by the idea that it's a net negative for the team when he doesn't play, and it's gonna be more than a slight problem if he's not brought back. For a team with a reputation for being good at drafting WR, we've got an athlete that we all HOPE can become a good receiver, and a guy who only slipped in the draft because of character concerns (who can't get on the field) waiting in the wings. Chris Henry slipped in the draft for character concerns too... He somehow managed to contribute from the jump.