10-30-2024, 08:38 PM
(10-30-2024, 03:34 PM)Lucius Cincinnatus Wrote: What does Moss (who started 8 games due to Taylor's injuries) being a back-up or splitting time have anything to do with the fact that you said he was good last year and Mixon was bad last year when essentially every stat (traditional or advanced) would tell you that they were very similar or Mixon is actually better? It's not like we are looking at just volume stats, we looked at the advanced stats like you suggested and Mixon was better in almost every single one....
When did I say anything about Mixon being awesome lol? It's so funny when people are called out for misinformation and then completely fabricate an argument to attempt to justify their comment. I never said Mixon was awesome, great, or even good. Simply that if you called Mixon "bad" last year, I'm not sure how you can possibly argue that Moss was "good".
I didn't fail to grasp the point. The example you used to make your point was just blatantly false, hence my comment. I'm not sure why have failed to grasp reality...
A backup has a lower bar than a premier RB1 at a high salary, and again, the point was that most RBs will struggle in this offense. Again, your lack of comprehension is preventing you from seeing the point.
In 2023 Moss had a better YACON/AT and was a much better pass blocker. 2 key things this offense needed. Moss also led the league in rushing yards over expected on shotgun runs in 11 personnel. Which is what we ran all last year. Im guessing you didnt realize this..? In fact he was 5th in the league in ROYE last season. I never said Moss is better overall than Mixon, but in key categories that are important to our offense he was good in 2023. You comparing totals when Mixon had 75 more rushing attempts is really dumb, in my humble opinion.
The fact that you go on some silly little tangent that totally misses the point is embarrassing.
