Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Why Not Franchise Tag Tee Higgins Twice?
#55
Get use to it, Higgins is leaving, and losing Bengals should have let him leave as he wanted back in Free Agency last March.  

It's too expensive to pay the Franchise Tag price on Tee Higgins and fight with him and his agent doing it.  

Bengals can NOT keep Chase and Higgins in 2025, no way, no how.  Chase should NEVER be a Franchise Tag player, that is too Mike Brown Bengalized to even consider.  

Adios Higgins, and Chase signed long term at a far more expensive contract than Chase was asking for this season.  It's going to cost Bengals a ton to lock in Chase now, but they nee Burrow To Chase LSU Combo.  Burrow and Chase huge contracts means adios to Higgins.  

If the Bengals don't get with it, they are gong to have early draft picks anyway.  Time to bring in new players on the rookie cheap, which is music to Mike Browns ears.  However Bengals can no longer pay Chase his rookie contract, and Chase is going to demand what he is worth, and he is worth plenty.

I still say what I said all along.  The smart move would have been to let Higgins go free agent last March, and lock in Chase a year early to a long term contract.  Now it's going to cost Bengals a whole lot more to lock in Chase long term.  I thought tagging Higgins was stupid in 2024.  The losing record also backs me up on that. Fighting with Higgins and his agent and fighting with Chase and his agent is just TOO MIKE BROWN LOSER FOOTBALL. 
1968 Bengal Fan




Messages In This Thread
RE: Why Not Franchise Tag Tee Higgins Twice? - kevin - 11-15-2024, 04:02 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)