Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Way Too Early Pan Me Mock December 16
#22
(12-18-2024, 10:28 PM)puddycat Wrote: As Joe Goodberry points out, we often play a 5 man front, which means that having more DTs isn't out of the question.  IMO you chose 2 DTs who don't really rush the passer and you did so in the 1st two rounds.  I'd be good with either one of your DTs picks.
IMO we need more speed and athleticism on defense at every position except CB, with edge being a priority.
CTB, Hill, and Anthony could all be CBs or safeties. Figure it out already.
Lastly we could use a swing OT and IOL, who should be on the athletic side as well.
Draft Philosophy: I HATE picking talented players who couldn't produce in college which leave coaches scratching their head as to why they still don't produce in the NFL.  You can have all the smarties for your chess team; I want to have the ones who actually know how to play chess.

Deone Walker led the nation in pressures last year and had 7.5 sacks and doesn't rush the passer?

This is a pretty poor OL class.  Yeah, I would like to get someone, but we're just at a point of having more holes than picks.  That's why I just focused on getting good players instead of trying to hit specific needs.  Plus, it's a good FA G class and T isn't a need, aside from depth.
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: Way Too Early Pan Me Mock December 16 - Whatever - 12-19-2024, 10:31 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 6 Guest(s)