Tee vs a NEW D

[*TheLeonardLeap*]

(12-28-2024, 10:50 PM)Nicomo Cosca Wrote: I wouldn’t call it nostalgia considering Tee is only 25 years old and still very good. I can understand the sentiment of not wanting to tie up that much money in 2 WR’s (fair), but keeping a player of Tee’s caliber is also pretty easy to get behind.

I was wrong about being fine with letting Bates walk and man it would SUCK if Tee goes somewhere else and balls out and we use that money on a bunch of Rankins and Stone’s.

For the SB run that people seem dead set on keeping everyone together to keep trying to run it back despite diminishing returns every year.

If we're going to be operating from an assumption of "we'll just use the money on shitty FAs" then we should just forfeit 2025 in advance rather than bother trying.