Tee vs a NEW D

[*jason*]

(12-28-2024, 10:50 PM)Nicomo Cosca Wrote: I wouldn’t call it nostalgia considering Tee is only 25 years old and still very good. I can understand the sentiment of not wanting to tie up that much money in 2 WR’s (fair), but keeping a player of Tee’s caliber is also pretty easy to get behind.

I was wrong about being fine with letting Bates walk and man it would SUCK if Tee goes somewhere else and balls out and we use that money on a bunch of Rankins and Stone’s.

I was only ok-ish with letting Bates go if it meant keeping Tee. If they lose both, this organization is garbage.