Can someone explain..

[Truck_1_0_1_]

(12-30-2024, 05:42 PM)Isaac Curtis: The Real #85 Wrote: I thought it was a catch. Though I can see the counter-argument, I cannot see it hit the ground at any point. I mean, Hilton claws it away long after they are OOB.

For me, he has control before the helmet goes out. Yeah, it is close. But nothing to show he DIDN'T have control.

They said stands, not confirmed. If it is called the other way, then that probably stands as well.

I did not expect it to be overturned and don't feel hard done by on that play at all. The issue is the D giving it up, not the refs.

Some of you guys need to take off the orange and black glasses. 

If he has control, then Martavis Bryant's TD in 2015 shouldn't count, Gresham's incompletion in 2011 should have counted and I can point to a whole slew of others: by definition, the ball was being bobbled and as we all know (and what Nate said), had it been called INC on the field, would've stayed that way.