Yesterday, 03:36 PM
(Yesterday, 01:59 PM)CJD Wrote: The main point of my post was the bullet points. There's a major lack of talent on this roster and ranking the players made those issues very apparent. I mentioned it was difficult to parse the middle of the roster because of the varying roles and experience levels of the players.
You're getting stuck in the weeds. I encourage you to come out of the weeds and engage in the point of the post.
Best to worst, impact/ importance, and talent level are vastly different things.
That's even more confusing because the defense largely has more talent, while the offense is a couple of studs and a bunch of B/C tier FA's and late draft picks, but for some strange reason, the offensive guys consistently rank higher than the defensive ones on your list.
The defense has a ton of young talent that needs to develop in a system they can thrive in. They all played better once Lou finally switched things up late in the year. That's not a "talent" issue.
On offense, you have Burrow and the scheme making a lot of guys look better than they actually are.