01-25-2025, 10:47 PM
(01-25-2025, 10:34 PM)samhain Wrote: They've forgone re-signing several key players from the Super Bowl team. Tee's situation is what it is. Logically, you might want to avoid putting that much money into 2 receivers. That's all well and good, but at what point do you decide that a player is worth retaining? Tee is a known. So is Ja'marr.
We've been told for years that they were letting guys go to keep other ones one the team. Who exactly are these other ones? When do they decide to actually commit to a player that has contributed?
If I thought not keeping Tee meant a serious commitment to competently improve other parts of the team, then I'd be okay with it. I'm not so sure. I'd rather keep the known that let him go and trust this FO to direct the money to other resources.
They made a mistake with Bates. Doesn’t mean they have to re-sign everyone to atone for their sin. Should’ve kept Bates and let tee leave
It's because you are of such profound wisdom, Frank Booth. - SunsetBengal
