3 hours ago
(3 hours ago)Frank Booth Wrote: Goodberry follows analytics. Analytics say pass the ball
but honest question to you, does the success of the chiefs and bills with their lack of elite weaponry just go over your head?
even if the bengals dont sign Tee, they would still have Jamarr, which is better than any weapon KC or buffalo has. Which in theory should give the bengals the privlige to allocate more money to the rest of this terrible bengals roster
The absence of an elite weapon is the reason the Bills didn't beat the Chiefs in my opinion. I love Burrow and wouldn't trade him but he can't do what Allen does running for tough yards. Mahommes I would say is more mobile as well and while we beat them at the WR position I'd say they beat us in Coach, FO, DC and defensive players and probably OL play. So we can point at one aspect of they're team and ignore the rest but I don't feel like that's a winning formula.
I agree in theory we could bring in multiple players that would have a bigger impact on the winning than resigning Tee. But the likelihood of that seems to be very low. You have to find the right players and be able to sign them if you don't like doing contracts like the rest of the NFL that is tougher all while creating a giant hole that needs to be filled with atleast a day 2 pick.
