Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Reds starting pitching staff, is it enough?
#11
(02-03-2025, 12:25 PM)bengalfan74 Wrote: https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/other/reds-starting-pitching-projected-to-rank-near-top-of-the-league-in-era/ar-AA1yhMNN?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=ASTS&cvid=c58a4a5bce814a6fa65959c081b4476c&ei=33

I'm not sure I understand what ERA+ is ? Anywho, I'm afraid we'll be decent thru like June then we'll start fading down the stretch.

Basically, it's another tool that's only used by Fantasy Baseball players/users/dorks to tell you the same thing that an ERA tells you.
Quote:ERA+ (Adjusted Earned Run Average) is a metric that evaluates a pitcher’s effectiveness while adjusting for league and ballpark factors. A league-average ERA+ is set at 100. Scores above 100 indicate better-than-average performance, while scores below 100 suggest below-average pitching. For example, an ERA+ of 120 means a pitcher is 20% better than the league average.
Only users lose drugs.
:-)-~~~
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: Reds starting pitching staff, is it enough? - Forever Spinning Vinyl - 02-03-2025, 09:26 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 7 Guest(s)