02-09-2025, 06:41 PM
(02-09-2025, 06:33 PM)SunsetBengal Wrote: He likely has a "no trade" clause that allows him to veto a move to a situation that he does not see favorable. I like what he's done over the years, but I wouldn't throw new money at him, simply for the privilege of having him on the roster. He could be spent.
I also forgot to mention any team trading for him will most likely also want some assurance of negotiating a new contract because he'll be a free agent in 2026 otherwise. I don't know if teams will want to trade much for a player only for one year. He would be fairly cheap salary wise for that team because his base salary and other bonuses are not that much in 2025 but I wonder what a trade for a 1 year rental would look like.
Overall, I don't think what the 49er's and Samuel will most likely be looking for fits the Bengals right now.
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)
![Rock On Rock On](http://www.planetsmilies.com/smilies/sign/sign0011.gif)