01-10-2016, 09:21 PM
(01-10-2016, 08:42 PM)fredtoast Wrote: I'd be fine with replacing Marvin if we had a proven upgrade.
When your team is losing it is fine to make a change and hope for the best, but when you are winning like the Bengals have I think you only replace the coach with a proven upgrade.
If we had gotten blown nout last night I would have been okay with replacing him with anyone, but that did not happen.
Suppose that Marvin would step down, and we had the chance to interview a few coaches with proven records of success in the post season, but each one had a distinctly different "style" about them. What style would you feel would be more appropriate for this organization; Someone who is more of a rigid disciplinarian, a hands on type of guy, in terms of working directly with players and position coaches to implement his system. Or a more laid back type that is more of a delegator, letting his coordinators and position coaches have the direct control over the player teachings, while keeping his mind on the master plan?
Volson is meh, but I like him, and he has far exceeded my expectations
-Frank Booth 1/9/23